Register for NAToday.net email updates. Enter your e-mail address here:

This counter provided for free from HTMLcounter.com!
Informed North Arlington
Citizens Served

"BUDGET BUSTER"

STATE DENIES PITMAN'S REQUEST TO PAY $445,995.82 DEFERRED CHARGE BY KAISER ADMINISTRATION OVER MULTIPLE BUDGETS
 
Pitman calls prior fiscal mismanagement a breach of duty and irresponsible!
 
NORTH ARLINGTON - The financial ills of the past continue to haunt the North Arlington budget process when state officials denied Mayor Pitman and the governing body the ability to pay off a $445,995.82 deferred charge from the Kaiser Administration.
 
In a letter dated May 12th (click here - see attached) to Judith Tripodi of the state's Department of Community Affairs, Pitman asked the Division of Local Government Services to "raise the charge over multiple years rather than in one."
 
"I do not feel that it is fair to place this administration in a situation that we are left to place a burden on the taxpayers of this Borough to make up past sins without showing how, why or who caused them to occur." said Pitman. "It appears that it was the responsibility of the CFO and the Borough Administrator at that time to properly review and to provide guidance to the council as to the proper course of action," said the first-term Mayor.
 
Pitman noted in his letter that the deferred charge could have been bonded and paid down over a period of twenty years. North Arlington had accumulated a debt of over $20 million dollars under the previous administration despite receiving over $45 million dollars in temporary host fees from the BCUA and NJMC.
 
In a letter dated April 28th (click here -see letter), Borough Auditor Edward Rees identified the expenditures as $400,000 for a Pumping Station on Disposal Road and a receivable of $45,995.82 from the NJMC.
 
The receivables were adjusted to deferred charges which is included in the new municipal budget.
 
According to Rees, the $400,000 "represents the share North Arlington were required to provide funds to make up for the difference."
 
"If the Borough had passed a bond ordinance for the amount of the construction that it was required to finance, then there would have been no need to create the deferred charge," stated Rees.
 
In a letter dated May 23rd from Judith Tripodi, Assistant Director of the state's Division of Local Government Services (click here- see letter), Tripodi states "The Division recognizes the negative impact prior years' fiscal mismanagement on Borough taxpayers. Accordingly, the Borough has been awarded Extraordinary Aid for the past several years to mitigate the tax implications on residents. While the Division cannot statutorily address your request to raise the deferred charges over multiple years, please be assured that your CY 2005 Extraordinary Aid application will be given full consideration in light of your current fiscal circumstances," said Tripodi.




 

 



 



 

.
.
.
.
.
.
.